M-Net pulls Oscar Pistorius ‘Oscar’ campaign from screens

 

oscar pistorius

M-Net has confirmed that it has pulled an ad campaign featuring paralympic athlete Oscar Pistorius. Pistorius was arrested following the shooting death of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp early Thursday morning. Pistorius has since been charged with murder.

The campaign, promoting the live broadcast of the Oscar award ceremony on Feb 25, featured an events planning company abducting Pistorius for an “Oscar themed evening.’ The ad ends with Pistorius, a double amputee, telling them that their idea ‘has no legs.’

“Out of respect and sympathy to the bereaved, M-Net will be pulling its entire Oscars campaign featuring Oscar Pistorius with immediate effect,” the company said in a statement released to the media.

– Exclusivemedia & marketing news you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

Breaking news: New creative leadership announced for Net#work BBDO

 

network bbdo

Net#work BBDO has announced its new creative leadership team following the departures of Executive Creative Director Rob McLennan and Deputy Executive Creative Director Graeme Jenner.

McLennan and Jenner were amongst those who left following the loss of the Nedbank account late last year to Joe Public.

Net#work BBDO decided to promoted internally – Chief Creative Officer Mike Schalit had already indicated that the move of McLennan and Jenner would allow the next layer of creative talent to move up within the agency.

Jenny Glover and Brent Singer have been appointed as Joint Executive Creative Directors of Net#work BBDO. Bruce Anderson was appointed to a new leadership support role, which will see him form part of a new Executive Creative#Council with Glover and Singer, which will report directly to the Schalit.

– Exclusive industry news you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

Shelf Life with Louise Marsland: Will this new tobacco legislation hit SA?

Louise Marsland’s (@Louise_Marsland) pick of new product, packaging and design launches.

Will this new tobacco legislation hit SA? Kellogg’s tries to make women feel good about losing weight; Jacobs coffee takes to the skies with Mango; and Chivas turns to CID to provide a window on their displays…

No smoke without fire

Cigarette

Australia’s decision to introduce a law that requires tobacco companies to sell their products in plain packages has caused a lot of controversy and speculation on if these new rules will eventually filter through to South Africa.

This law has major ramifications for tobacco companies and Rachel Sikwane, an associate at ENS (Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs), helps decode the implications.

The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 of Australia came into effect on 1 December 2012. The new law requires all brands of cigarettes to be sold in identical olive green packs featuring graphic images of mouth ulcers, gangrene and other consequences of smoking – these health warnings must cover 75% of the front of the pack and 90% of the back. The brand name (without the logo) and the variant (like menthol) may appear on the pack, but only in very small print.

The pictures  are disgusting and may discourage any and all shopping, let alone cigarette purchases if those packs are displayed in store!

New Zealand has also indicated that it will follow Australia’s lead and pass plain packaging legislation. An Indian MP has announced that she will be putting forward a private member’s bill for plain packaging legislation in India, and the South African government has made it clear that it wishes to introduce similar legislation, says Sikwane.

“The tobacco industry in South Africa has already given a very strong indication that it will challenge any such legislation in the Constitutional Court. The tobacco companies are likely to argue that a law requiring them to use unbranded packs contravenes the Constitution, which says that no-one should be deprived of property, and that in the case of an expropriation compensation must be paid.

“In support of this they will argue that – because such legislation will prevent them from using their trademarks and because the law says that a registered trademark that isn’t used for five years is vulnerable to cancellation – the legislation will be tantamount to expropriation. They may well argue that they will be entitled to significant compensation, because trademarks are very valuable assets.

“The government, on the other hand, may argue that legislation of this nature simply restricts the way in which tobacco companies can use their trademarks, whilst not depriving them of ownership.

“The government may also argue that, even if the legislation does constitute expropriation, the purpose of the expropriation must be considered and that, as the purpose is the promotion of public health, compensation should be modest,” Sikwane explains.

Image: stock.xchng – the leading free stock photography site

Weight watchers

kelloggs

Kellogg’s is repositioning its Special K brand in the South African market with a new look, a new variant (Oats and Honey) and a new campaign. The theme is to get women to be comfortable with their figures, but if they want to lose weight, Kellogg’s Special K can assist.

The campaign is centred around the tagline ‘What will you gain when you lose?’, focussing instead on the positive things women have to gain when they achieve their shape management goals, as opposed to just the numbers on the scale.

“What we’ve learnt as a brand team globally is that women don’t want to be reminded of how hard it is to lose weight, but rather, encouraged by that wonderful feeling of achievement and the positive emotions they feel when they reach their goal. For too long the conversation has been a negative one, but starting now, we’re focusing on everything women have to gain,” explains Kara Timperley, marketing category manager at Kellogg’s South Africa.

One activation will feature giant scales placed in key malls nationwide, which give women positive feedback instead of their weight when they climb on.

These creative elements are supported by out of home billboards and print ads, both of which depict a scale with the word ‘pride’ on the dial and online at www.myspecialk.co.za, women can log on to receive customised meal plans to help them maintain or manage their shape.

The agencies responsible for the various elements  include JWT (TV, print, OOH, radio); Trigger/Isobar (digital); Brainfood (in store media); Keynote (mall activations) and Taryn Fritz PR (media liaison).

Smell the coffee

Jacobs mango

Jacobs coffee has taken to the skies with Mango airline in an activation orchestrated by Provantage.

To demonstrate the “verwohnaroma” of Jacobs coffee to high flyers, Provantage has launched a campaign that will see all tray tables and head rests on Mango flights branded with Jacobs coffee. And to experience the flavour and aroma of the brand, Mango passengers are being served fresh cups of Jacobs coffee while in the air.

The sky high campaign will run until March.

Window branding

Clarion Chivas

Pernod Ricard selected CID to design and implement window branding for premium brands Chivas Regal, Absolut, Glenlivet and Jameson at The Cape Quarter Spar Tops.

The production and installation of the floor-to-ceiling windows was completed by Clarion Retail.

Louise Marsland– Shelf Life by Louise Marsland is a weekly column on MarkLives. Tweet new product, packaging and design launches to @louise_marsland.

– Want to sponsor Shelf Life? Contact us here.

Louise Marsland has written about the FMCG, media, marketing and advertising industry for 18 years of her 25 year media career as a former Editor of magazines AdVantage, Marketing Mix and Progressive Retailing; as well as websites Bizcommunity.com and FMCGFiles. She currently edits the weekly Wednesday Media & Marketing Page for The New Age newspaper; and is the co-founder and Publishing Editor of SA’s newly launched industry trendwatching portal, TREND. at www.trendlives.info, in partnership with MarkLives.com.

– Industry profiles you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

Blogger Math Takes On Facebook

 

by  Bob Hoffman (@adcontrarian), San Francisco Bay I saw some numbers last week on how the top 10 retail brands are doing on Facebook.

The numbers came from the 4th quarter of 2012 — the Christmas selling season which is by far the best season for most retailers and, presumably, the season at which Facebook activity would be highest for retailers.

The numbers are startling.

We know that ads on Facebook are alarmingly invisible, with click through rates somewhere around 5 in 10,000. But we’ve been told that the real value in Facebook is not in display ads but in engagement on brand pages.

From what I can tell, these things are just as ineffectual as display ads. Let’s do some blogger math (full disclosure: blogger math is known to be unreliable and is not to be confused with real math.)

Let’s take Walmart as an example. According to the report I read at Business Insider among retailers Walmart has the most fans on Facebook — over 26 million. When Walmart posted something during the holiday period, they averaged about 19,000 “fan actions” per post. A “fan action” is defined as either a “like” or a “share” or a “comment.”

I did a little math to find an “engagement rate” — in other words, to find out at what rate people who self-select themselves as fans of Walmart interacted with Walmart’s posts on their page. The engagement rate came out almost identical to the average click-through rate for ads — .0007.

In other words, 7/100 of one percent, or 7 in 10,000. This isn’t even rounding error. This is almost all noise and no signal.

Not only that, the calculation uses the most charitable possible definition of “engagement.”

The people who did the study (and have a vested interest in the advancement of social media) cavalierly include “liking” as engagement. I doubt that disinterested observers would agree that an action that takes a third of a second is anything approaching “engagement.”

Then deduct from that number all the people at the agency who were directed to do gratuitous liking, sharing, and commenting and all their friends and relatives, and all the people in the marketing department and all their friends and relatives, and all the hate comments on Walmart’s page that are counted as “engagement,” and all the click-bots that are working overtime in the Ukraine, and all the inadvertent clicks due to poor hand-cursor coordination, and you have yourself the real number.

If you can call it a number.

– The Ad Contrarian is Bob Hoffman, ceo of Hoffman/Lewis advertising in San Francisco and St. Louis. Hoffman is the author of The Ad Contrarian and 101 Contrarian Ideas About Advertising. Reprinted from his blog The Ad Contrarian.

– Industry profiles you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

Cell C denies it is out to pitch as fallout from Vodacom account move continues

by Herman Manson (@marklives) The Cell C advertising account is not out to pitch. Karin Fourie, Senior Manager: Public and Media Relations at Cell C, confirmed that the account cellclogois not being moved. “Ogilvy is still our agency of choice,” says Fourie.

It has been widely speculated in the ad industry that Cell C would be ill pleased to sit in the same group (WPP) as Vodacom (with Ireland/Davenport) and MTN (with MetropolitanRepublic) and that the account has gone out to pitch.

This follows Vodacom’s move from Draftfcb to WPP controlled Ireland/Davenport announced last week. Ogilvy Johannesburg, also a WPP company, retained the Cell C account last year after CEO Alan Knott-Craig pulled the plug on a pitch won by FoxP2 and King James.

Knott-Craig, during his tenure at Vodacom, worked closely with Draftfcb, which had held the Vodacom account for more than 19 years. Draftfcb has retrenched 40 staff members since the account loss was announced last week.

– Industry news you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

Ad of the week with Oresti Patricios – AbsolutZA

MarkLives Ad of the Week with Oresti Patricios – AbsolutZA

absolut vodka

For most people there is probably one vodka brand that is top of mind: Absolut Vodka. I don’t even drink vodka, but I love this brand. It has a personality – it is fun, quirky, sometimes sexy, often outrageous. It has noticeability, talk-ability. You’ll stop and look at an Absolut ad or billboard, because you know there’s something – a hidden message, a play on words, a design trick… and the execution is always intelligent.

Absolut Vodka is produced only in Åhus, in southern Sweden.  Since its launch in 1979, Absolut Vodka has achieved worldwide sales growth from 10,000 nine-litre cases (90,000 litres) to 11.0 million nine-litre cases in 2010 (99.0 millions of litres). That has made it the third or fourth best-selling refined spirit in the world.

Heck, there are even fans with fan-pages – not only on Facebook – try www.absolutad.com, or www.absolutads.com. There have been spoofs and parodies, of course, which – as we know – is the sincerest form of flattery. It also underscores the brand’s impact on pop culture.

Instead of spending fortunes on logo design, the product, with its distinctive bottle shape, is the star. We all know the familiar spotlight-design pack-shot, along with a simple, two-word headline, using ‘Absolut’ as an adjective. Print ads are carefully placed in publications that are consistent with class, quality and style. Apart from the distinctive single page ads, Absolut has also experimented with ‘Collections’ – like the Seven Sins: separate pages throughout the publication, with the distinctive bottle artfully portraying Lust, Sloth, Gluttony, Greed, Envy, Wrath and Pride, and an eighth with a halo over the bottle, labelled “Absolut Seven”.

The bottle is also the star in their latest production campaign: Absolut Unique, featuring four million one-of-a-kind bottles, with artwork created by bespoke “robot painters” on the assembly line.

Absolut are known for their unusual campaigns, which generally focus on the socially relevant aspects of life, rather than the obvious. They have not been afraid to take on controversial topics like war, gay pride and HIV/AIDS.

They have partnered with artists to create “interpretive” campaigns, including Andy Warhol, Keith Haring, Damien Hirst, Ed Ruscha, as well as Swedish artists like Linn Fernström, Dan Wolgers and Ola Billgren, and paid homage to writers, poets, and musicians, like Dan Black and Swedish House Mafia. Filmmakers too: Spike Lee was commissioned to produce “Absolut Brooklyn”, a homage to his iconic New York home base.

One big challenge for global brands like Absolut, is to be identified with local culture. Unlike Count Pushkin vodka which identified only with Russia, or Jim Beam which identifies with the American South – the Absolut brand wants to be at home anywhere in the world. So they have to understand the local culture, creating a “warm and fuzzy” response in the process.

The latest South African campaign by NATIVE for Absolut does this very well. For the ‘AbsolutZA’ campaign, the company asked four young, trendy artists, collaborating with local bead-workers, to produce four bottle covers. The artists are each featured in 1’30” commercial spots, talking about their art, their life and their approach to the challenge. You may not have heard of Athi, Dan Halter or Cameron Platter before, but when you see them, you identify with them as South Africans; their stories are compelling. [Ed note: the campaign ended shortly before our Ad of the Week went live] .

And the call to action is clear. The site, www.AbsolutZA.com is a Facebook-based page, with an interactive app. Click “Like” and a whole new dimension appears. You see, the fifth bottle in the campaign is blank. So anyone can upload a piece of original art, and see how it renders out as a bead-based bottle cover. These are displayed on the page, and other Facebook types can vote for the ones they like.

The winner who gets voted to the top will get his bottle cover made as a prize, and contributors also stand to win one of the four original works. I know this is beginning to sound like a press release – but I think this campaign is just plain clever, on all levels. It ticks all the boxes: locally relevant, supporting the “little guy”, crowd-collaboration to appeal to the “inner artist” in everyone… what’s not to like? Or should I say Absolut, what’s not to love.

absolut

PopUp_FOUCHE

Ad of the Week is published on MarkLives every Wednesday. See past selections here.
Oresti Patricios is the CEO of brand and reputation analysis company Ornico.

– Industry profiles you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

What you need to know about POPI

by Herman Manson (@marklives) The Protection of Personal Information Bill (POPI), which will probably be signed into law in the next few months, will have a significant impact on how marketers may obtain and handle customer information.

Elizabeth de Stadler, a senior associate at Esselaar Attorneys, will be speaking at Content 2013, the content marketing conference taking place Elizabeth de Stadleron the 25th and 26th February 2013 at the Fugard Theatre in Cape Town, on the impact of POPI on especially content marketers.

Her talk will cover what the implications and legal obligations are when it comes to the data content marketers collect, what security requirements are required to protect user information, what is required for consent and how the limitations of usage have changed. MarkLives asked her for some insight into the Protection of Personal Information Bill in advance of her talk at Content 2013.

Q: When will POPI come into effect and what timeline does it give content marketers to comply with regulations?

Elizabeth de Stadler: The Protection of Personal Information Bill has not been signed into law yet. This will probably happen in the first quarter of 2013. Even then businesses will be given a year to comply. This means that there is still time to reflect on the real implications of the Bill and implement solutions. It does not mean that you must ignore the Bill – it has very real implications and it will take time to become compliant.

MarkLives: Briefly, what are the implications for Content Marketers in terms of Protection of Personal Information Bill?

De Stadler: The Bill regulates anything you do (or don’t do) with personal information no matter how you came to have it in the first place. You have to inform consumers that you have it, how you got it and what you are going to do with it. The Bill itself recognises several ways of getting personal information and reasons for keeping it and using it, but the best way to ensure that what you are doing is legal is to have the consumer’s informed consent.

So it will affect the way you gather information for market research (for instance), but I would say that the biggest implication for Content Marketers is how they use personal information to contact consumers with more marketing material like newsletters. The Bill specifically regulates ‘direct marketing’. This is a risky area as we already know that direct marketing can irritate consumers to the point that it is bad for your image and that they are willing to go through great lengths to complain about it.

The Bill will also apply to your existing database. This means that Content Marketers must start thinking of strategies for how they are going to ‘legalise’ the personal information which they already have and what method they are going to follow to ensure that the information that they get from now (as in tomorrow) on is legal.

MarkLives: What are the penalties for contravening the act?

De Stadler: The Bill makes place for yet another regulator, the Information Regulator. The regulator will be able to investigate businesses on content 2013its own and respond to complaints from the public. There are criminal sanctions in the Bill, but more importantly the Information Regulator may impose fines of up to R10 million. That is on top of your legal costs. That is the legal risk, but of course there are other risks involved here.

If the Information Regulator does not like the way a business is treating personal information it will serve a compliance notice in terms of which the business will have a limited time to correct its behaviour. Experience has told us that changing the way you gather, store and protect personal information can be very complicated. Doing it in a short time with the Information Regulator breathing down your neck may be more expensive than doing it on your own time. So, there is the risk of operational costs.

Lastly, there is of course the risk to your reputation. Consumers have more power now than they did 10 years ago because of the platform given to them by social media. If you spam them (or it feels to them like you are spamming them) they are able to complain very publicly.

MarkLives: What is the major plus points of this legislation from a consumer point of view?

De Stadler: Personally, I would say the chance that it might decrease spam. If you think about it protecting personal information is about making it harder for businesses to sell personal information or to use it without the consumer’s consent making it harder to bombard consumers with unwanted marketing.

MarkLives: Do you think we are being over-regulated in South Africa?

De Stadler: No, not in the area of privacy protection. Save for the Consumer Protection Act and the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act we have not had any formal privacy protection in this country. This Bill is based on international standards and is bringing us up to speed with the rest of the world. Whether it will work of course remains to be seen.

Looking at the bigger picture, there is some concern that the cost of setting up a business has become prohibitive for small businesses due to the volume of regulations that have been introduced in the last couple of years.

– Industry news you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

Conflict at The Sunday Times: why Ray Hartley resigned

grubstreet

by Gill Moodie (@GrubstreetSA) Sunday Times editor Ray Hartley resigned from the flagship Times Media Group (TMG) newspaper, Grubstreet can reveal, because of conflict over the paper’s editorial direction with TMG MD Mike Robertson.

Two well placed sources have told Grubstreet that Hartley and Robertson – a previous editor of the Sunday Times himself – had been at loggerheads for some time.

Grubstreet approached Robertson for comment on Friday and today but he has not  responded. We will update with his comment should it come.

While Hartley himself would not comment on the claims, staff members at the paper say one of the flashpoint issues was the future of one of the sections of the newspaper.

Considering that prominent columnist Fred Khumalo – who is also the Review section editor – and Marcia Klein, the Business Times editor, are part of a group of senior staff members that have been shown the door in preparation for Phylicia Oppelt taking over as editor in March, the section that caused the Hartley-Robertson showdown is likely to have been either the Review or Business Times section.

Hartley is understood to have been furious at what he perceived as unacceptable management meddling in editorial areas traditionally the domain of the paper’s editor and decided to resign.

Many were caught by surprise two weeks ago when TMG – which owns the Sunday Times, The Times, Sowetan, Sunday World, The Herald and the Daily Dispatch  – announced that Hartley was to be replaced by Oppelt, who is editor of The Times.

TMG was vague about Hartley’s future when it announced his resignation, saying  that he would “assume a senior position” within the company after a two-month sabbatical.

Even more surprising was that the decision to change the editor of the Sunday Times came only one week after TMG got a new management team under Andrew Bonamour, CEO of private equity company BlackStar that owns 12% of TMG.

Bonamour stepped into TMG’s CEO position after Colin Cary left unexpectedly in January. TMG said Cary left because the board and he could not reach agreement on a share-based incentive scheme for him.

In an interview with Grubstreet last week reflecting back on his editorship, Hartley said: “I thought that I was going to do it (edit the Sunday Times) for longer but in the end you’ve got to follow what happens. And I’d kind of reached a point where I felt I was treading water a little bit. When it’s time, it’s time…At a certain point you feel: ‘Maybe it’s time for a change’. And I think everybody agreed that it was.”

What do you think? Where should the line between  business managers and editors be?

– SA’s leading media commentator, Gill Moodie, offers intelligence on media – old and new. Reprinted from her site Grubstreet.

Sign up for our free newsletter!

The Dissident Spin Doctor: In this market the greatest risk is standing still

by Emma King (@EmmainSA) So, hands up who saw the recent demise of HMV, the UKs biggest music retailer, coming?

“It was obvious,” we all scoff.

“We could all see that was going to happen,” we scorn.

“They didn’t move fast enough and they didn’t keep up with the times,” we nod wisely. “And they didn’t diversify quick enough to develop a business model around online purchases.”

But what about Atari, another company that also went bust this year? An old company, but one with a strong brand synonymous with gaming, the new ‘music’. How did they get it so wrong as to become obsolete? What does that mean for the rest of us?

We know we are in a time of constant change. The world insists we be faster and more adaptable and ever more transparent, while consumers become ever more critical and vocal.

We are scared to make mistakes – we can be publicly ridiculed and consumers (and the rest of the industry) are quick to jump on the back of anyone who blunders.  We’ve seen brands fold, countries go into recession and corporate giants (Amplats anyone?) go from Goliath to David in the blink of the eye.

It’s tempting to find a formula that has worked and stick to it – to stand still. The concept of ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ is rife amongst people wanting to keep their jobs and meet their targets.

But in times of change isn’t standing still the biggest risk of all? Isn’t continuing to do what we have always done the most foolhardy approach?

Corporate giants who were not quick enough to change their business model (take note ad agencies) have crashed out of business.  HMV tried, at the eleventh hour, to diversify into gaming, but they weren’t quick enough.

Where some people see change as an obstacle, others see opportunity. Developers of M-Pesa in Kenya didn’t let the lack of bank accounts or internet access stop them developing a new way of banking, which the rest of the world is looking to learn from.

Or what about Vice magazine, faced with an uncertain future and declining profitability? They upweighted their creative services team, formed an in-house content creation agency and began playing the dual role of publisher and agency.

Embrace change and use obstacles as a challenge to develop new ways of working.

As agencies, we need to question the norm and try new things. We need to stop being constrained by what we have always done or what we think our job description entails. We need to question where our responsibilities end and look to ways in which we can really innovate, challenge thinking, and make a real difference to our client’s bottom line and reputation.

And clients – give it a go. Dare to try something new. By all means use research and consumer insights to guide thinking, but let your instincts give you the confidence to be innovative and grow your brands.

Emma King is Head of PR at The Jupiter Drawing Room (Cape Town). She is a columnist for MarkLives on PR and communication issues. You can find her on Twitter at @EmmainSA

– Industry news you’ll make time for. Sign up for our free newsletter!

Online CPD Courses Psychology Online CPD Courses Marketing analytics software Marketing analytics software for small business Business management software Business accounting software Gearbox repair company Makeup artist