by Artwell Nwaila (@artwelln) Imagine a world where political parties attempt to get creative when it comes to voting season. A place where thought is put into a tagline beyond the dull call to action: “Vote for me”. A world where campaign posters capture your attention like a well-crafted full circle campaign.
One has to admit that South African political parties are mastering the below-the-line space and this is because our history has made it vital for leaders to get down on the ground and talk to the people.
One of today’s BTL shining stars is defiantly the EFF. Building a house for a (supposedly) poor lady right next to Nkandla is a brilliant tactic! It bursts with talkability, great PR value and should also impact the community immensely (not so much for the lady as she may be in danger, according to various newspaper reports, but impact, nonetheless).
Be that as it may, the organisations need to put equal energy into their through-the-line and above the line tactics. It must be noted that there is a gradual improvement brewing from within the DA and ANC as they get creative with how they use of Twitter, Mxit and Facebook to talk to the masses (when I say “creative”, I mean creative for them and that’s not very creative).
Today’s article will focus on the trends of boring political posters from various past campaigns.
Political parties claim to offer unique views from their counterparts and it’s really hard to see this in their posters.
Let’s be honest: placing a picture of a political leader accompanied by “VOTE ***” is blatant laziness and says nothing about their intentions. You’d think now would be a good time to be specific as the tech-savvy ‘born frees’ step into to the voting booth for the first time.
This type of poster is actually a good symbol of how detached political parties are from the people. Imagine if Coke did a print ad with the tag line “BUY COKE”. It’s arrogant and in no way inspiring.
The difference with Coke and political parties is that one offers you a reason to support it in an emotional and personal way; the other doesn’t.
We get the ‘I’m trying to be controversial because I’ve got nothing to say’ poster. This type is worse than the above-mentioned example as it makes the organisation more critical than visionary.
We also have the not-so-clever ‘play on words’ poster (which also falls in the ‘trying to be controversial because I’ve got nothing to say’ poster space).
Then there is the design of the posters. Honestly speaking, this is not the most important thing in this space and it’s driven by who they are talking to. The IFP would need to focus on good copy in the language of its target market, the DA on both good copy and design.
The above poster from 2011 is not designed in the latest design style, which is okay for this target market. If the copy is translated into all relevant languages, it would be more impactful than “VOTE X”.
History has seen political posters being beautifully crafted, with stunning copy to match. As the years have gone by, we have been subjected to substandard work due to the complacency of political parties globally.
The above undated poster is an interesting piece (even though it is not a voting poster), as no copy is needed; the image says it all. This is the perfect example of the eventual evolution into complacency.
The above Abraham Lincoln poster from 1860 is a good example of the stunning design standard of past years.
Although a little risky, the 1968 Richard M Nixon camp tried different ways to connect with different communities.
Robert “Bobby” Kennedy’s campaign poster, also from 1968 helped him become popular with young voters. This is a good example of knowing your audience.
The goal for political parties when creating posters is to produce content which connects with their targeted audience. Campaigns that provide inspiring messages through the use of smart copy and good design generally cut cleanly through the clutter —provided that it is woven strategically into the rest of the campaign.
A good example of this is the 2008 Barack Obama campaign:
The campaign team created an iconic design that has gained cult status and will live on for years to come. The proposition is one word, one word that is more impactful than 10.
The Obama campaign team continued this trend across all its material by using a winning formula: one powerful word accompanied with stunning design.
So, this is a shout out to political parties to find their formula and be professional about it — it’s just not right to be subjected to the current visual pollution. Down with bad posters, down!
Artwell Nwaila (@artwelln) is a creative director at Offlimit Communications and publisher of the award-winning creative publication SA Creatives (@thesacreatives). His monthly column on MarkLives, “Creation”, will take a look at creative work from around the world and what we can learn from it in South Africa.
— MarkLives’ round-up of top ad and media industry news and opinion in your mailbox every three work days. Sign up here!